<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sans Serif Serif</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thescienceofmarketing.com/index.php/blogging/sans-serif-serif/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thescienceofmarketing.com/index.php/blogging/sans-serif-serif/</link>
	<description>This site and its comments reflect our approach to the world, that while marketing is definitely an art, it must also be underpinned with reason, logic and science.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 02:52:23 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Todd Cabral</title>
		<link>http://www.thescienceofmarketing.com/index.php/blogging/sans-serif-serif/comment-page-1/#comment-15337</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Cabral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 02:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thescienceofmarketing.com/?p=390#comment-15337</guid>
		<description>Brand guidelines and, of course, personal preference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brand guidelines and, of course, personal preference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Gwynne</title>
		<link>http://www.thescienceofmarketing.com/index.php/blogging/sans-serif-serif/comment-page-1/#comment-15333</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Gwynne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thescienceofmarketing.com/?p=390#comment-15333</guid>
		<description>Yes, it depends.  So, beside web versus print, readability versus legibility, what are the other depends?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it depends.  So, beside web versus print, readability versus legibility, what are the other depends?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Cabral</title>
		<link>http://www.thescienceofmarketing.com/index.php/blogging/sans-serif-serif/comment-page-1/#comment-15325</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Cabral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 02:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thescienceofmarketing.com/?p=390#comment-15325</guid>
		<description>It totally depends.  I&#039;m thinking of inventing a font called sans sans serif.  But then that would just be serif, wouldn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It totally depends.  I&#8217;m thinking of inventing a font called sans sans serif.  But then that would just be serif, wouldn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Chandler</title>
		<link>http://www.thescienceofmarketing.com/index.php/blogging/sans-serif-serif/comment-page-1/#comment-15323</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Chandler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thescienceofmarketing.com/?p=390#comment-15323</guid>
		<description>A childhood friend of mine, David Rakowski, actually created many of the fonts in use today.  Connected with him after a 30 year gap or so and that was one of the tidbits I learned.  Like the answer to many questions on which is better: It depends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A childhood friend of mine, David Rakowski, actually created many of the fonts in use today.  Connected with him after a 30 year gap or so and that was one of the tidbits I learned.  Like the answer to many questions on which is better: It depends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
